TO CLINT BRADFORD...


 Posted by Gregory Burnham ® , Jan 21,1999,03:01 
                                                Post Reply
                                                          
                                                          Forum 


...And anyone else who cares to comment.

This is not the Clint Bradford anti-alterationist forum. You have quoted Parks who is, "among those
who believe the Zapruder film may have problems..."

He does not think the problems in the film are substantiated by Jack's presentation...

SO WHAT?

I am open to ANYONE who seeks to offer their own RESEARCH on this subject. I welcome the
evidence of Z-film tampering, no matter who the source of that evidence happens to be or which
theories that person supports.

I believe that a reportage on "Parks' evidence of Z-film tampering is germaine to our JFKresearch
FORUM.

His criticism of Jack's work IS NOT as important as his own evidence in support of Z-film
alteration. I would like to see his work and/or opinion posted here with a focus toward what "we
collectively agree upon"-- that is: The Zapruder film has been altered.

Clint, you are really pushing beyond your scope or ability in the area of logical dialogue. In a battle of
wits you appear to be unarmed.

Don't let your "alligator mouth overload your blue-jay ass" further because you are disrupting this
forum intentionally and it is quite apparent to us all. If you think that I am overstating the obviousness
of your "fly being open in public" let us hear from your defenders and supporters.

You are not contributing to the research you are obsessive/compulsive to the point of TOTAL
fixation on the White video...

Let it go. It is not the CENTER of the solar system. Jack's video seems to be more important to you
than it is to Jack.

Now, I'm asking you nicely... please let us get on with our research.

A final attempt to bridge the gap...

monk