Date: 3 Mar 1997 22:11:03 -0700 Subject: Re: If NOT A Muzzle Blast, then what? Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk.moderated From: John McAdams jack white wrote: : Russell Burr wrote: : > : > JvonH wrote: : > > : > > Greetings everyone, : > > : > > There has been another on-going discussion about Gordon Arnold and : > > the Moorman photo, I see. Reports--sheesh, hate that... say that it : > > may not be a muzzle blast in front of Badge man's face. Ok, then what : > > is it? How could background light show through in that position on any : > > one? And Badge man is standing in the shadow of the trees to boot! : > > : > > It's a muzzle blast! : > > JvonH : > : > Hi Jvon, It's most likely sunlight reflecting of the leaves; at least : > that was the conclusion of photo experts at MIT. See the NOVA : > presentation on "Who Killed President Kennedy" from I believe 1988. : JILMARIE...AS I HAVE ALREADY POSTED, THESE WERE GUYS FROM POLAROID, NOT : MIT! POLAROID DISAVOWED THEIR STATEMENTS AND REPRIMANDED THEM. THE **REAL : EXPERTS** FROM MIT VERIFIED THE IMAGE. Jack, I just reviewed the NOVA video. NOVA credits "experts from Polaraod and MIT." They have, on camera, Brain Halstrom and Steve Isabell. Would you kindly do this: First, give us a source for Polaroid "disavowing their statements" and "repremanding them." I frankly find it difficult to believe Polaroid would do this, and wonder whether there is not some misunderstanding on your part. Second, please give us a source for MIT "verifying" the image. I see an MIT guy on NOVA saying it's not a shooter. Please tell me were I can find people from MIT who will say that it *is* a shooter. .John