While Tony Marsh claims to have an explaination for the ghost images, I wonder why his 5 second analysis failed to report these, most obvious ghost images. These images were captured from left-center frame, yet within the camera's field of view. Marsh has asserted that the images are of buildings, streets and images which were not within the camera's reach at the time of each frame. From these two examples alone, should not all of the images ghost-like in nature be captured from the same "general location" from within each frame? Being left center of the Zapruder frame? Thoughts anyone? Robin