Subj:  Lundberg/AMA & JFK		Section: JFK Debate
  To:  Anthony Marsh, 72127,2301	Sunday, June 11, 1995 9:58:00 PM
From:  Gerard McNally, 73763,436	#367814

Tony,

>You have not been keeping up with the latest info and reading the necessary 
texts. Seems that I have to visit the copy machine this weekend. The JAMA article 
has all the autopsy doctors NOW agreeing that there was a bullet entrance 
wound at about the level of the EOP. And as you state, this is a blatantly obvious 
error when you look at the X-rays (I think you mean photos, perhaps?).
 
Absolutely false conclusion! Boswell and Humes gave a long interview and Finck 
gave a separate interview. They talked about things that mattered to them, 
namely that they have been abused over the years by people ignorant of the 
facts, who weren't there. Humes said that the beveling of the skull made it 
blatantly obvious that the shot entered from the rear; stated he was in charge; 
stated that the head did most definitely have a brain & that the idea of JFK 
arriving in a body bag was preposterous. The whole purpose of the interview 
was to dispel the myths.

They said nothing about the location of the wound! It was only after letters from 
Aguilar and other conspiratorialists came in that the Doctors basically refused to 
engage the question and said that they had submitted an autopsy report and 
they were sticking with it.

Boswell said the same to Aguilar: we wrote a report; that's where to go to to get 
good info, not from us in '94.

BTW, it was through computer enhancements of the X_RAYS that the FPP was 
able to determine the location of the head wound. 

Jerry