Rich has looked at my video and posted a nice message on Queenbee.
     Here is my reply to his kind message:

     Thanks, Rich! It is great to hear some nice words for a change
     instead of all the trash being posted by anti-alterationists
     who have not even seen or studied the tape yet.

     I wish everyone would consider this:

     I present a dozen or so anomalies which either PROVE or SUGGEST
     tampering. MAYBE I could be wrong on some of them. Maybe
     some have an innocent explanation which I have overlooked or
     not yet discovered. BUT...WHAT IF EVEN ONE OF MY POINTS IS 
     ABSOLUTELY TRUE???? IF ONE POINT IS TRUE, THE THE FILM MUST,
     I REPEAT MUST...BE TAMPERED WITH! Does anyone have an answer
     for this? The anti-alterationists MUST DISPROVE EVERY POINT
     or admit the film if fake! Can they?

     Two of my proofs are indisputable, in my opinion...that Mary
     Moorman took her photo while STANDING IN THE STREET, and the
     LENGTH OF THE YELLOW CURB STRIPE providing a perfect scale
     for comparison with Z frames.

     So far the disinformationists have been spreading misinformation,
     disinformation and flat-out lies about what my video contains.
     Much of it is so ridiculous that it is beyond contempt and 
     beyond answering. How can one respond to points which are
     deliberately wrong? How can one debate sensibly with someone
     who has not seen or misrepresents my research? Why do some
     post their OPINIONS as if their opinions are evidence? Why
     is their opinion better than mine or yours? I am more than
     willing to look at any EVIDENCE which may show I may be wrong.
     In the two months it took to do my research, I did not have
     time to be as thorough as I would have liked, but I was trying
     to meet the Lancer deadline. I actually DID A LOT OF RESEARCH.
     I cannot see that very many others have. Most just sit on their
     hands and wag their tongues. Talk evidence and I will reply.

     I will not to respond to all the personal diatribes being posted.
     I have contempt for those making unwarranted personal 
     attacks and will have NO dialog with any of them.

     I WILL answer specific reasonable questions about the 
     EVIDENCE or MY OPINIONS and how I reached them.

     I have changed my mind about where I will talk about the video.
     I will use only Queenbee and Rich*s Board, since the atmosphere
     at a.c.jfk and Startext are too hostile with certain confrontational
     residents there. I had previously told Bradford I would respond
     on any of the groups, so I hope he sees this.

     Back to the video:

     There was one point which I thought some might challenge me
     on, so you probably saw the insert I put with each tape
     which reiterates something in the narration which I was afraid
     I had not given enough emphasis. Here is what my addendum note
     says:

     >>>>RESEARCHERS PLEASE NOTE:

     >>>>My narration notes that the replica JFK limo placed in the Z313 location
     by professional surveyors is provably about 8 feet too far east, which
     also places Mary Moorman too far east by the same amount. I do not know whether
     this egregious error resulted from faulty furnished documentation, human error, or some
     unknown motive by Turner Network Television, producers of a documentary which
     hired the surveyors. My use of limo photos in this slightly errant position has no
     significant effect on my research or conclusions, but you should be aware of the
     surveyor error.<<<<


     I think this speaks for itself, and I hope no one challenges the research
     because of this survey error. In fact, the error of the surveyors would
     be an interesting subject for someone to research. These were professional
     surveyors. They were using computerized transits with laser beams. They referred
     to documents and photos to determine the location of the limo. They were attempting
     to locate bullet trajectories, and could not afford to place the limo 8 feet too far east,
     unless someone had erroneous figures...or an agenda.These professionals are
     accustomed to working to the nearest hundreth of an inch. A huge error placing the
     limo 8 feet too far east is unthinkable unless they were furnished SS, FBI or WR
     figures which were in error. What are your opinions of this possibly significant
     (to the TNT documentary) error in placement? 

     Thanks.

     Jack White

     Rich DellaRosa wrote:
     > 
     > At 03:34 PM 12/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
     > >Dang, Rich...and I had a note here to do that! In the rush the
     > other
     > >day to mail them on time (took me 4 hours to package, label,
     > stamp, 2 trips
     > >to post office, etc.) I plumb forgot. I also forgot to do
     > something
     > >that Doug Weldon asked me. My notes were in my office, and I
     > was
     > >doing all the stuffing and mailing on the dining room table.
     > Out of sight,
     > >outta my mind! If you want, I can sign a duplicate label, mail
     > it to you,
     > >and you can stick it over the present label. Us celebs gotta
     > keep fans
     > >happy! :)
     > >
     > >Lemme know what you think after you look at it.
     > >
     > >Jack
     > ========================
     > Jack,
     > 
     > After viewing the video, I must say in all candidness,
     > that it is an outstanding piece of research. It would be a
     > valuable addition to any researcher's collection at ten times
     > the price!! My congratulations Jack on your fine attention to
     > detail and dedication to the resolution of this case. William
     > Reymond's appearance on the tape was like icing on a cake. I
     > cannot say enough about the presentation of what you've
     > discovered. Excellent -- purely excellent work.
     > 
     > Rich D.
     > ---------
     > Visit the JFKresearch message board at:
     > http://www.mtexchange.com/jfk/forum.html
     > 
     > and the JFK Photos Archives at:
     > http://www.mtexchange.com/photos.htm